THE CRITICAL ROLE OF
OXYGEN SENSORS IN
MAINTAINING MORE MPG AND
REDUCING EMISSIONS
One or more oxygen sensors (O2
sensors) positioned on a vehicle’s exhaust system are a critical part of the
engine's fuel management system.
They monitor the air-fuel mixture so an engine’s computer can adjust the
air/fuel ratio to maintain the lowest possible emissions and the best fuel
economy. They need to be replaced
every so often because over time they start slowing down until they quit – and
slow or dead O2 sensors can cause all kind of emission problems and a 10-15%
loss of fuel economy. In fact, the
only time most driver’s become aware of a problem with an O2 sensor is when
their vehicle’s Check Engine light comes on, the vehicle fails an emissions
test, their engine does not run well, or their vehicle begins using too much
gasoline.
In 1976, the O2 sensor was
introduced - originally called a "Lambda sensor" when first used in European
fuel-injection applications to monitor the oxygen level in the exhaust so a
vehicle’s onboard computer could regulate the air/fuel mixture. Beginning in 1980-81, an O2 sensor has
been a standard equipment item on passenger car and light trucks in the U.S.,
and since the late 1980’s, two O2 sensors have been typically used on most V-6
and V-8 engines. In 1995-96, the
introduction of the federally mandated Onboard Diagnostics II (OBD II) resulted
in the doubling of the number of oxygen sensors per vehicle (i.e., the extra O2
sensors are used downstream of the catalytic converter to monitor its operating
efficiency).
How an O2 Sensor Affects
the Air/Fuel Mixture
The air/fuel ratio of any
vehicle’s engine will vary depending on operating conditions. When an engine is warm and operating
under light load, an air/fuel mixture of 14.7 parts air to 1 part fuel (14.7:1
ratio) provides the best combination of power, fuel economy and emissions. Known as the "stoichiometric" air/fuel
ratio, it is also referred to by the Greek letter "lambda." Thus, when lambda equals one, there is
ideal combustion (a 14.7:1 “stoichiometric” air/fuel ratio).
When the air/fuel ratio is less
than 14.7:1, lambda is less than one and an engine has a “rich” fuel mixture
since the relative proportion of fuel to air is higher than the stoichiometric
ratio. A rich fuel mixture is
necessary when a cold engine is started and when a warm engine is under
load. It produces more power (12:1
is considered optimum) but also sharply increases fuel consumption and pollution
- namely carbon monoxide emissions (CO).[i]
When the air/fuel ratio is more
than 14.7:1, lambda is greater than one and an engine has a “lean” fuel mixture
since the relative proportion of fuel to air is lower than the stoichiometric
ratio. A “lean” fuel mixture
improves fuel economy and lowers emission levels but reduces power.[ii] If the air/fuel mixture is too lean
(beyond 18:1), it may not ignite (“lean misfire”) which can result in a rough
idle, loss of power, and increased hydrocarbon (HC) emissions because the fuel
does not ignite and just blows right through the engine. Extremely lean fuel mixtures can burn
spark plugs and pistons and contribute to engine-damaging conditions such as
pre-ignition.
When the proportions of air and
gasoline are "just right," it burns efficiently and produces the fewest
emissions. However, an engine’s
fuel requirements change with speed and load. To go faster or when under a load, an
engine needs more air and fuel to develop more power. In that event a richer air/fuel mixture
ratio is required. When an engine
is loafing along or coasting, the air/fuel mixture can be leaned to reduce fuel
consumption and improve fuel economy.
The trick is to balance the air/fuel mixture ratio as driving conditions,
loads, and temperatures constantly change.
That's where O2 sensors come in.
By monitoring the level of unburned oxygen in the exhaust, an O2 sensor
quickly informs the engine’s computer when the fuel mixture is lean (too much
oxygen) or rich (too much fuel).
The computer then adjusts the fuel mixture by quickly increasing the fuel
when the mixture is lean (even by a little bit), or by quickly decreasing the
fuel when it is rich (even by a little bit). On average, this rapid flip-flopping
back and forth allows the feedback fuel control system to maintain a
more-or-less balanced mixture.
Why Normal Wear-and-Tear
of the O2 Sensor Causes Less MPG
The speed at which an O2 sensor
reacts to oxygen changes in the exhaust is critical for accurate fuel control,
peak fuel economy, and low emissions.
The air-fuel mixture in an older carbureted engine doesn't change as
quickly as that in a throttle body fuel-injected application, so response time
is not as critical. However, in
engines with multipoint fuel injection, the air-fuel mixture can change
extremely fast, requiring a very quick response from the O2 sensor.
A newer or good O2 sensor quickly
responds to changes in the air/fuel ratio.
However, nothing lasts forever and O2 sensors are no exception. As an O2 sensor ages, it doesn’t react
as quickly as it once did. The
increased lag time makes the sensor sluggish and prevents the engine from
keeping the air/fuel mixture in close balance. Also, when a vehicle’s engine is
operating, oil ash and contaminants from normal combustion accumulate on the
sensing element, reducing the O2 sensor's ability to quickly respond to changes
in the air-fuel mixture. Thus, the
O2 sensor will always slow down and become "sluggish" with normal engine
operation over time. Also, the O2
sensor's output voltage may not remain as high as it once was, giving the
erroneous impression that the air/fuel mixture is leaner than it actually
is. Under various operating
conditions this may result in a richer-than-normal air-fuel mixture that will
cause an increase in fuel consumption and emissions. Since this change occurs gradually, the
problem may not be noticeable right away.
Over time, the situation will just keep worsening. Therefore, to restore engine performance
the O2 sensor must be replaced. A
new O2 sensor can improve fuel economy as much as 10-15% and will minimize
exhaust emissions, reduce the risk of costly damage to the catalytic converter,
and ensure peak engine performance (no surging or hesitating).
Why Sensor Failure
Causes Less MPG
Aging and normal use of a vehicle
will cause an O2 sensor to fail.
However, an O2 sensor can also prematurely fail if it becomes
contaminated with lead from leaded gasoline,[iii] phosphorous
from excessive oil consumption, silicone from internal coolant leaks, using
silicone sprays, or using silicone gasket sealers on the engine. Environmental factors such as road
splash, salt, oil, and dirt can also cause an O2 sensor to fail, as can
mechanical stress or mishandling.
A dead O2 sensor will prevent the
vehicle’s onboard computer from making the necessary air-fuel corrections,
causing the air-fuel mixture to run richer in the default "open loop" mode of
operation (fixed air/fuel ratio setting).
This will result in much higher fuel consumption and emission levels.[iv] Also, an O2 sensor failure may cause
damage to the catalytic converter.
A rich operating condition causes the converter to run hotter than
normal. If the catalytic converter
gets hot enough, the catalyst substrate that is inside may actually melt -
forming a partial or complete blockage – causing the buildup of backpressure in
the exhaust system. That can cause
stalling or a drastic drop in highway performance or stalling. Therefore, to restore engine performance
the O2 sensor must be replaced. A
new O2 sensor can improve fuel economy as much as 10-15% and will minimize
exhaust emissions, reduce the risk of costly damage to the catalytic converter,
and ensure peak engine performance (no surging or hesitating).
When O2 Sensors Must Be
Replaced
To minimize
encountering/suffering lower mpg and other dire consequences that can result
from O2 sensor failure or aging/use, the O2 sensor must be replaced at the following
intervals:
Unheated Thimble-type Zirconia
O2 Sensor (LS):
every 30,000-50,000 miles
1976 to early-1990’s (pre-OBD)
vehicles
(1 or 2 wire connection)
Heated Thimble-type Zirconia
O2 Sensor (LSH):
every 60,000 miles
1st generation mid-1980 to
mid-1990 (pre-OBD II) vehicles
(3 or 4 wire connection)
Heated Thimble-type Titania O2
Sensor:
every 60,000 miles
1986 to 1994 (pre-OBD II)
vehicles
(3 or 4 wire connection)
Heated Thimble-type Zirconia
O2 Sensors (LSH):
every 100,000 miles
2nd generation mid-1990 and up
(OBD II) vehicles
(4 or more wire connection)
Heated Planar-type O2 Sensors
(LSF):
every 100,000 miles
1997 to present (OBD II)
vehicles)
(4 or more wire connection)
Heated Wide-Band O2 Sensors
(LSU):
every 100,000 miles
2004 to present (OBD II)
vehicles)
(4 or more wire connection)
Some External Factors
That May Trick an O2 Sensor
Since an O2 sensor reacts to
oxygen in the exhaust and not fuel, any engine problem that allows unburned air
to pass through the cylinders will also trick an O2 sensor into reading
lean. For example, a leaky exhaust
valve - even a leak in the exhaust manifold gasket - may allow enough air into
the exhaust to screw up the sensor readings. It won’t damage the O2 sensor, but it
will create a rich running condition that hurts emissions and fuel economy.
Something else you need to know
about O2 sensors is that they have to be hot (617° to 662° F) to produce a
voltage signal. It may take a few
minutes for the exhaust to heat up the sensor, so beginning in the mid-1980’s,
most vehicles have been equipped with a built-in electrical heater circuit to
get the sensor up to temperature as quickly as possible. Usually, these are three-wire and
four-wire O2 sensors. Single and
two-wire O2 sensors are unheated.
If the heater circuit fails, it won’t affect the operation of the O2
sensor once the exhaust gets hot but it will delay the computer from going into
closed loop, which may cause a vehicle to fail an emissions test.
The Different Types
of O2
Sensors
Unheated Thimble-type Zirconia
O2 Sensors (LS): Introduced in
1976 for feedback fuel control on automotive engines, it consists of a zirconia
ceramic "thimble" is encased in a protective tube which extends into the exhaust
manifold. Slots in the protective
tube allow hot exhaust gases to reach the thimble. It may take several minutes to generate
a signal after a cold start because it relies solely on the heat from the
exhaust to reach normal operating temperature. Consequently, an unheated sensor may
cool off at idle and stop producing a signal causing the engine control system
to revert back to "open loop" operation (i.e. fixed air/fuel ratio
setting). This type of O2 sensor
has a single wire connector, though some have two.
Heated Thimble-type Zirconia
O2 Sensors (LSH): Introduced in
1982, this sensor adds a heater element connected to a separate electric circuit
so the O2 sensor achieves operating temperature between 30-60 seconds. The heating element reduces cold start
emissions and prevents the O2 sensor from cooling off at idle. This type of O2 sensor has 3 or 4 wire
connectors.
Heated Thimble-type Titania O2
Sensors: Introduced in 1986,
Titania O2 sensors use a different type of ceramic and instead of generating a
voltage signal that changes with the air/fuel ratio, the sensor's electrical
resistance changes. It was only
used on a few vehicles, less than 1% of all O2 sensor-equipped vehicles from
1986 to 1994. No OBD II equipped
vehicles (1995-96 to present) use it.
Heated Planar-type O2 Sensors
(LSF): Introduced in 1997, this
O2 sensor has a flat, ceramic zirconia element rather than a thimble. The electrodes, conductive layer of
ceramic, insulation and heater are all laminated together on a single
strip. The new design works the
same as the thimble-type zirconia sensors, but the "thick-film" construction
makes it smaller, lighter and more resistant to contamination. A new heater element warms it to
operating temperature in only 10 seconds while using less electrical power than
older type heating elements. In
2004, these O2 sensors accounted for 30% of all O2 sensor applications. By 2008, it is expected to account for
up to 75% of all O2 sensor applications.
Heated Wide-Band O2 Sensors
(LSU): The newest O2 sensor
technology builds upon the planar design and adds the ability to directly
measure the air/fuel ratio via producing a signal directly proportional to the
air/fuel ratio so the air/fuel ratios that can precisely measured from very rich
(10:1) to extremely lean (straight air).
Instead of flip-flopping back and forth like previous O2 sensor designs,
the engine’s computer adds or subtracts fuel as needed to maintain a steady 14.7
to 1 “stoichiometric” air/fuel ratio.
Another difference is a heater circuit that keeps a consistent operating
temperature so the sensor will reach operating temperature in 20 seconds. This sensor allows precision fine-tuning
of the air/fuel mixture ratio so beside the Halo Spark Plug, it offers the
greatest promise for increasing mpg.
[ii] However, the 31.92% quicker ignition of
the air/fuel mixture produced by Halo Spark Plug produces more horsepower for
the same amount of fuel so as to improve economy and further lower
emissions.
[iv] According to a study conducted by Sierra
Research, Inc., O2 sensor failure is the "single greatest source of excessive
emissions for fuel-injected vehicles" and the second most significant cause of
high emissions in carbureted engines.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Air Resource
Board (CARB) have discovered that replacement of an O2 sensor was required on
42-58% of all vehicles subjected to an emissions check.
|